PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN EVALUASI TEACHING FACTORY SEKOLAH MENENGAH KEJURUAN BIDANG SENI DAN EKONOMI KREATIF DEVELOPMENT OF TEACHING FACTORY EVALUATION INSTRUMENTS VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND CREATIVE ECONOMICS

Article Sidebar

Sendikraf is an academic, open access, and peer-reviewed journal. It was first published in November 2020 by BBPPMPV Seni dan Budaya, which is a technical implementation unit of the Directorate General of Vocational Studies, Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia. BBPPMPV Seni dan Budaya is in charge of increasing the competency of vocational education teachers and implementing the quality assurance of vocational education. This journal is published 2 (two) times a year, in May and November. It contains articles, both research-based and non-research studies as well as conceptual ideas in the field of arts education and creative industries. Article submissions are open throughout the year. Before submitting an article, please ensure that the article is in accordance with the focus and style of Sendikraf. Guidelines and procedures for submission can be further accessed in the online submission section.
PDF
Published: Jul 28, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.70571/psik.v5i1.148
Keywords:
Instrument, Teaching Factory, Tefa, Vocational Education, SMK

Main Article Content

Dwi Yunanto
BBPPMPV Seni dan Budaya Yogyakarta
Tri Hartiti Retnowati
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Sri Wening
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Abstract

The research was motivated by the Teaching Factory (TEFA) program which had not yet undergone a comprehensive evaluation. One of them is the lack of a comprehensive evaluation instrument. In this regard, this research aims to 1) Find the instrument construct used to evaluate SMK teaching factories, 2) Determine the quality characteristics of SMK teaching factory instruments, 3) Find the results of analysis of SMK teaching factory instruments. The research method used is development research. This research is in the form of instrument development research for implementing TEFA in schools. Based on the results of the analysis of the 57 questions on the Input assessment instrument, it can be concluded that all the items are suitable for the model or model fit. Because the item has fulfilled the requirements, it is said to be fit for the model in the Winstep program, for example, if the Outfit MNSQ value is 0.5 to 1.5 or the Outfit ZSTD value is -2 to 2, or the Pt-measure Corr is positive then it can be said to be an item. is fit or suitable for the model


Penelitiaan dilatarbelakangi oleh program Teaching Factory (TEFA) yang belum dilakukan evaluasi yang komprehensif. Salah satunya belum adanya instrument evaluasi yang komprehensif. Sehubungan dengan itu penelitian ini bertujuan untuk 1) Menemukan konstruk instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengevaluasi teaching factory SMK, 2) Menentukan karakteristik kualitas instrumen teaching factory SMK, 3) Menemukan hasil analisis instrumen teaching factory SMK. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian pengembangan. Penelitian ini berupa penelitian pengembangan instrument untuk pelaksanaan TEFA di sekolah. Berdasarkan hasil analisis dari 57


butir pertanyaan instrumen penilaian Input, dapat disimpulkan bahwa keseluruhan butir cocok terhadap model atau model fit. Karena telah memenuhi syarat butir dikatakan fit terhadap model pada program winstep, antara lain jika nilai Outfit MNSQ sebesar 0,5 sampai dengan 1,5 atau nilai Outfit ZSTD sebesar -2 sampai dengan 2, atau Pt-measure Corr bernilai positif maka dapat dikatakan butir tersebut fit atau cocok terhadap model

Article Details

How to Cite
Yunanto, D., Retnowati, T. H., & Wening, S. (2024). PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN EVALUASI TEACHING FACTORY SEKOLAH MENENGAH KEJURUAN BIDANG SENI DAN EKONOMI KREATIF: DEVELOPMENT OF TEACHING FACTORY EVALUATION INSTRUMENTS VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND CREATIVE ECONOMICS. Jurnal Pendidikan Seni Dan Industri Kreatif, 5(1), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.70571/psik.v5i1.148
Issue
Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): SENDIKRAF Jurnal Pendidikan Seni dan Industri Kreatif
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

Dessouky, M. M., Bailey, D. E., Verma, S., Adiga, S., Bekey, G. A., & Kazlauskas, E.

J. (1998). A virtual factory teaching system in support of manufacturing education. Journal of engineering education, 87(4), 459-467

Direktorat Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. (2023).

Panduan Tefa SMK.

Djemari Mardapi. (2012). Pengukuran Penilaian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Nuha Medika.

Drs. Hajar Pamadhi, M. (2019). Pendidikan Seni.

UNY Press.

Enke, J., Glass, R., & Metternich, J. (2017). Introducing a maturity model for learning factories. Procedia Manufacturing, 9, 1-8.

Instruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2016). Revitalisasi Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan dalam Rangka Peningkatan Kualitas Ddan Daya Saing Sumber Daya Manusia Indonesia. Instruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 9 Tahun 2016, 1–19. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Download/225 642/Inpres Nomor 9 Tahun 2016-.pdf

Klaus Schwab. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Portfolio Penguin.

Munajat. (2020). EKONOMI KREATIF; Suatu

Konsep Ekonomi Baru. In Suwardi (Ed.), Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan (Vol. 7, Issue 2). Eureka Media Aksara.

Pemerintah Indonesia. (2022). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 62 Tahun 2022 tentang Revitalisasi Pendidikan Vokasi dan Pelatihan Vokasi. Kementerian Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia, 132424, 17.

Suyitno. (2020). Pendidikan Vokasi Kejuruan Srategi dan Revitalisasi Abad 21.